How the purity score is built.
Clean USDT ranks mixer routes on one practical question: how clean the output looks after the route. The score is editorial, test-led and evidence-labeled.
The route score is weighted, not guessed.
A strong mixer score needs clean output, credible evidence and low friction. Cheap fees alone do not win the ranking.
Privacy strength
Resistance to public-ledger clustering, address linkage, timing correlation and deposit-to-payout matching.
Weight 35%Output cleanliness
Whether withdrawal behavior creates practical separation between the origin wallet and fresh payout address.
Weight 30%Delay and pool depth
Randomized timing, split outputs and enough liquidity depth to reduce amount and timing correlation.
Weight 20%Fee and speed
Network fee profile, service-fee clarity and active time before clean output arrives.
Weight 15%Not every claim gets the same confidence.
Fees, explorer data, provider policies and Clean USDT tests are separate evidence types. The label tells readers what was observed, claimed or externally sourced.
| Evidence type | How it is used |
|---|---|
| Observed test | Dated Clean USDT route check with network, route settings and result notes. |
| Provider claim | Mixer or route-provider statement used only where independent proof is unavailable. |
| Public-chain observation | Explorer, protocol or transaction data point that can be rechecked by the reader. |
| External source | Regulator, protocol document or intelligence source used for definitions and risk context. |
Route tests focus on the real privacy break.
Route preview
Deposit rail, fee, delay controls and payout split before a user sends funds.
Network coverage
TRC20, ERC20, BEP20 and whether each route fits real destination support.
Timing break
Delay options, output splitting and resistance to simple time matching.
Pool depth
Liquidity signals and anonymity-set quality by network.
Fee clarity
Network fee profile separated from service-fee claims.
No-log posture
Provider-stated no-KYC and no-log claims, labeled when not independently verifiable.
External sources explain mechanics, not our ranking.
Official and high-trust sources explain token standards, gas models, traceability and compliance context. They do not prove our purity score or provider claims.
| Source family | Used for |
|---|---|
| Tether and protocol docs | Network support, token standards and issuer context. |
| Ethereum, TRON and BNB Chain docs | Gas, resource and network-fee mechanics. |
| Explorers | Contract, transaction and supply context at a specific check date. |
| FinCEN, OFAC and industry intelligence | Mixer definitions, tracing mechanics, AML/sanctions risk context and responsible-use boundaries. |
What the score does not mean.
A high purity score is not a legal opinion, a guarantee of anonymity, a guarantee of compliance, or proof that a provider never keeps logs. It is a route-quality judgment based on evidence available at the review date.